Setter:
Variables that were decisive in choosing best setter (in order of importance): Setter Efficiency, Vote, Win-Loss ratio, Service Efficiency, Attack Efficiency and Blocking Efficiency
| 1 | Krenicky Charlotte |
| 2 | Coppin Charlotte |
| 3 | Divoux Aziliz |
| 4 | De Leeuw Yana |
| 5 | Van de Vyver Jutta |
Outside-Hitter:
Variables that were decisive in choosing best setter (in order of importance): Attack Efficiency, Reception Efficiency, Service Efficiency, Win-Loss ratio, Vote and Blocking Efficiency
| 1 | Leys Charlotte |
| 2 | Gilson Helena |
| 3 | Chrtianska Jr. Monika |
| 4 | Stragier Manon |
| 5 | Coolman Nina |
Middle-Blocker:
Variables that were decisive in choosing best setter (in order of importance): Blocking Efficiency, Attack Efficiency, Service Efficiency, Win-Loss ratio and Vote
| 1 | Janssens Marlies |
| 2 | Jorgensen Amalie |
| 3 | Overwater Laura |
| 4 | Koulberg Anna |
| 5 | Vandewiele Iris |
Opposite:
Variables that were decisive in choosing best setter (in order of importance): Attack Efficiency, Blocking Efficiency, Points scored per set, Service Efficiency, Win-Loss ratio, attack percentage and Vote
| 1 | White Kory |
| 2 | Marring Nova |
| 3 | Fresco Lucia |
| 4 | Matejko Marta |
| 5 | Meynckens Laura |
Libero:
Variables that were decisive in choosing best setter (in order of importance): Reception Efficiency and Dig percentage
| 1 | De Quick Tine |
| 2 | Castano Diana |
| 3 | Demeyer Nel |
| 4 | Rampelberg Britt |
| 5 | Reul Océane |
